Ethioboi | Feb 18, 2010
THE REAL HABESHA | Feb 18, 2010
THE REAL HABESHA wrote:Did you ever pass in your mind that this is a legend, which has no proof who support that????Oh by the way is well known the name Menelik means "son of wise".
proethio | Feb 18, 2010
Checker | Feb 19, 2010
proethio | Feb 19, 2010
Yenis Arthur Rollins | Feb 19, 2010
proethio wrote:what about the Tigre?
yaya | Feb 19, 2010
Yenis Arthur Rollins wrote:<quoted text>Tigre aka Tigray do not share the same Amhara-Oromo roots. They are a totally different bloodline. They are primarily Nilotic sometimes combined with North African heritage, so no.
proethio wrote:<quoted text>ere tew! lol
Yenis Arthur Rollins wrote:<quoted text>Retrospectively, reflectively, and likewise who would argue? xaaqi xaaqi. lmao
THE REAL HABESHA | Feb 19, 2010
Ethioboi wrote:<quoted text>well according to you ethiopian history is a legend or a myth... you know everything about ethiopia,you konw who's habesha who's not....
MIKAL MODEBE | Feb 27, 2010
THE REAL HABESHA wrote:<quoted text>Maybe you should start to learn something, instead to believe of things, who has no found, nor you are able to defende them, but one thing is funny of you amharas, no one of you lose the spirit and creativity about your own origin. I am here in this forum since 1 year, and i saw that some amhara believe according to their tradition that they are descendant of jews, but funny you call biet israel, falasha who is not a good word, then other amharas claim to be habesha, but again other amhara say they are descendants of Himyarites, and then is arrived you with this "legend" about your origin. About one thing i am sure you are confused people suffer of evident identitu crisis. Now let's see if you are able to defende what you believe or not.You believe amhara and oromo have a common origin, they come from the king of Salem, but if you take a look the genetic about y-dna we know that 33.3% of amhara have HAPLOGROUP J1, while 14.6% have HAPLOGROUP A, 48.5% of you have HAPLOGROUP E3B, 2% instead have HAPLOGROUP J2 and so on, so is more than evident that the so called AMHARA people do not share the same origin and that the different haplogroups means different PLACES OF ORIGIN. Nor amhara, and oromo tradition spoke about it, just you, besides Oromo share the same ancestors, and culture with somalis, even their religion was the same.You speak about an ethiopian church in Nubia, but is weird there is no article about discovery of it, but also if we ipotize is true about that, we can consider that the church were built in christian era and therefore among 4th A.C. century and 7th/8th century A.C. because in 7th or 8th century Beja started to arise in Sudan and axumite domain ended for what is about Sudan, after 8th century a.C. we know very well that the axumite kingdom declane, and that Amhara reign didnt arrive until Sudan (Nubia), therefore i am asking to you how is possible in the manuscript is spoken about king Lalibela, who came much later of manuscript writing, is a magic? and above all who is the fool that believe that AMHARA according to your source accompanied the king in Jerusalem and then they came back in Ethio, such history old of few centuries will be easily recorded in amhara chronical, BUT IS NOT. Neither the Kebre Negst talk about the half of your story.Another funny thing is you put the king of Salem as the forefather of amhara and oromo, but is noted fact that king of Salem didnt have sons and therefore genealogy, just read in the bible Ebr7,1-4.You said that Axumite a man who live about 2850 years ago, and that Menelik lived 2950 years ago, but according to Ethio tradition axumite found the city of Axum, and Menelik who came later found there his capitale, so what you say, have no sense, but above all can you explain me how is possible that Axumite give his daughter to king Nabukedenesor, because anyone know that Nabukedenesor reigned among 1127 until 1105, while axumite according to you (2850 years ago)and ethio tradition lived at least 1000 years before Nabukedenesor.Also you claim amhara language is born before ge'ez, but funny all scholars and other experts agree that ge'ez is the father of amhara, and not the other way around, also to proof your point you use the meaning of the name Menelik, when is a well known fact Menelik means "son of wise".Oh almost forgot can provide a link where IRAQIS talk about the city of AMARA, i mean who found, when, ect ect because otherwise you prove nothing.
THE REAL HABESHA | Mar 1, 2010
MIKAL MODEBE wrote:<quoted text>You are the one who isnt talking right, because to me he is just giving guidlines! So u keep quiet, you are making noise!
MIKAL MODEBE | Apr 18, 2010
THE REAL HABESHA | Apr 18, 2010
MIKAL MODEBE wrote:@THE REAL,I am from the Medebay family. In the ancient script, it is my family name who inherited Ethiopia,check it.I dont know why the google search (Oromo: Trying hard to make us amharas link) stopped opening, but read thru the few words on thru the below link;www.google.com/m... Infact follow my story @:www.facebook.com/profile.php...
HadeLibi | Apr 18, 2010
Be notified when this thread is updated
You are currently logged in as . Not ?
By clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read our Terms of Service. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.
Politix Quiz: How much do you know about gun laws?
Sign In or Sign up
Mobile Site | Full Site
© 2014 Topix LLC