Local: Ashburn, VA Change
 

Comments

Posts 154801 to 154820 of 216889


No.

It's not a f**king firework, you tw*t.

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Light slows down the longer it travels, anyway.

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.


A ray tracer, a software used for lighting 3D environments, has light travelling the further it does, the darker the object appears when it hits the surface. Why? Explain, since the ray tracer is meant to mimic real life.

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Light slows down the longer it travels, anyway.


Wrong.

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
A ray tracer, a software used for lighting 3D environments, has light travelling the further it does, the darker the object appears when it hits the surface. Why? Explain, since the ray tracer is meant to mimic real life.


Inverse square law.

An odd analogy to a sh!t question.

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
A ray tracer, a software used for lighting 3D environments, has light travelling the further it does, the darker the object appears when it hits the surface. Why? Explain, since the ray tracer is meant to mimic real life.

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
http://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.ph...
As your photons or waves or whatever pass through a magnetic field they build a charge that reacts to the field they pass through.

Wrong.

[QUOTE]Let's take a .00001 percentage of error and multiply by many trillions. How much does that add up to?[/QUOTE]
Not multiplied. Stays at .00001%

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't been paying much attention in class, not surprised you didn't earn your way to getting a highschool diploma. Blame yourself for your lack of success in life!


No, I blame pencils. They make me misspell words.

ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
So because you have been shown to be foolish you claim I have an excuse?
You really are so sad, Be a man grow a set and admit you lies.


I will not admit I lies.

lol

Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
That your statement was incomplete.
The same thing you accuse others of being wrong about when they do the same.


Here it is again:

"The speed of light is not a constant."

What part of that do you find incomplete?

ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Or it could just be a bit of dyslexia, I donít need an ego like yours for being unable to spot errors particularly when the words is spelled correctly so my spell checker does not flag it up.
However if you want to LMAO at my disability, feel free to wet yourself, after all itís the christian way.


"when the words is spelled correctly"?!?

HA HA HA HA !!!!!

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
An agnostic is a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God.
I am not agnostic, I don't have that belief.

No god avaible!

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Inverse square law.


What is that? Squareroot has nothing to do with it.

Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
This does:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Nothing but a black hole can be contained in the area within these orbits.
You can admit you were wrong now.


That proves nothing, it's just a computer program - one so silly even my 14 year old son could create it in a few minutes.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I will not admit I lies.
lol


You made up lies about me.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That proves nothing, it's just a computer program - one so silly even my 14 year old son could create it in a few minutes.


How could he create it? Using what?

So Dave since you have repeatedly cowered away from my question can we safely assume I properly and accurately proved you wrong on your statement that believing in god, as you claimed makes you better than non believers and gives you the right to look down on them?

Your cowardice on this is remarkable I must say. I humbly accept your surrender by forfeit and rightfully so.

Dave Nelson wrote:
The Earth has to have matter emitting nuclear particles here and there and round about. A certain amount of plasma discharge has to occur, too.
If this is ejected into space, where will it go? Being heavier mass, would it not wind up heading for the sun? I would think electron would, too.
There has to be a return path for charged particles and loose nuclear bits back to the sun.

Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Right.
You are a gnostic theist.
You KNOW god exists.
Which is a logical absurdity.

There were some thousands gods, but not a single one is proved!

Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Right.
You are a gnostic theist.
You KNOW god exists.
Which is a logical absurdity.

God never exist!

How many thousands shall I bring? Churches are closing at an all time high while atheists like Dawkins can't rent out assembly halls large enough to contain the people wanting to hear him talk.

We see religion losing on a hundred fronts and it's only getting worse. Plus saying you're a believer but not belonging to a church to help organize is a victory for us.

Why even the GOP is poking you religious retards in the eyes in hopes of winning an election or two. Why? They realize appealing to religious retards is a losing proposition because your numbers are rapidly dwindling. Your ways are dying. It's for this reason alone your ilk wastes so much time, effort and money attacking us.

And you know it.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. You bring the deeds, I'll buy breakfast.

Givemeliberty wrote:
How many thousands shall I bring? Churches are closing at an all time high while atheists like Dawkins can't rent out assembly halls large enough to contain the people wanting to hear him talk.
We see religion losing on a hundred fronts and it's only getting worse. Plus saying you're a believer but not belonging to a church to help organize is a victory for us.
Why even the GOP is poking you religious retards in the eyes in hopes of winning an election or two. Why? They realize appealing to religious retards is a losing proposition because your numbers are rapidly dwindling. Your ways are dying. It's for this reason alone your ilk wastes so much time, effort and money attacking us.
And you know it.
<quoted text>


"Republicans have nothing but bad ideas and Democrats have no ideas."
~Lewis Black

Watching the Republican Party flail around as it recovers from its 2012 collapse has elements of tragedy and comedy. After all, it is the party that gave us Abraham Lincoln and Eisenhower, and a modern take on Jefferson's vision of limited government and states rights. But it is also the party of "legitimate rape," Grover Norquist, "self-deportation" and a mean and angry persona defined by Rush Limbaugh. That's the comic part.

Recovery will not be easy, and will likely follow the famous five steps Kubler-Ross describe in the aftermath of a death in the family: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance. To move on with your life, you go through each stage in turn.

Republicans are stuck on Stage One, denial, and can't move forward. In fact, they lost because of really bad ideas, which the American people rejected.

Rather than confront that reality, all kinds of silly excuses surface, all of which deny the awful truth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-brodsky...
Find the lowest prices with Find&Save!
Posts 154801 to 154820 of 216889

Add your Comments

You'll need JavaScript enabled to post comments

By clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read our Terms of Service. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.

Politix Quiz: Do you know the constitution better than most politicians?