Local: Seattle, WA Change
 

Comments

Posts 154801 to 154820 of 224164


polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Intensity decreases as the inverse square of the distance. That has nothing to do with the speed of light.


Why?

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Software, idiot! You really are childish aren't you?


*computer* software....

Are you really that dumb??

Were you beaten as a child?

There you go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_l...

It's got a picture and *everything*

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Why?

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
*computer* software....
Are you really that dumb??
Were you beaten as a child?


1. What computer software, moron?
2. And I'm sorry, boy, but you don't need to know.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Here it is again:
"The speed of light is not a constant."
What part of that do you find incomplete?


Add in "if it travels through non-uniform medium(s)."

If you claim that your statement is complete, then I can say "The speed of light is constant", and it will be equally valid.

You can admit you were wrong now.

Apology accepted.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That proves nothing, it's just a computer program - one so silly even my 14 year old son could create it in a few minutes.


Those are actual images, idiot.

Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Add in "if it travels through non-uniform medium(s)."
If you claim that your statement is complete, then I can say "The speed of light is constant", and it will be equally valid.
You can admit you were wrong now.
Apology accepted.


Ok, Mr CherryPicker....

That's like saying "That was good food!" is incomplete because I didn't specify why.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, Mr CherryPicker....
That's like saying "That was good food!" is incomplete because I didn't specify why.


Just admit you were wrong.

You are the original cherry picker.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That proves nothing, it's just a computer program - one so silly even my 14 year old son could create it in a few minutes.


No, those were the results of actual observations. Here is more information:

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

We observe the motions of the stars close to the center of our galaxy. Those stars are orbiting a very massive object that is not seen. Its mass and size means it has to be a black hole.

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, those were the results of actual observations. Here is more information:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
We observe the motions of the stars close to the center of our galaxy. Those stars are orbiting a very massive object that is not seen. Its mass and size means it has to be a black hole.


If it can't be seen, how do you know it exists?

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, those were the results of actual observations. Here is more information:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
We observe the motions of the stars close to the center of our galaxy. Those stars are orbiting a very massive object that is not seen. Its mass and size means it has to be a black hole.


If it cannot be seen, how do you know it exists? And since a black hole can have any mass and size, how are you supposed to be sure?

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, those were the results of actual observations. Here is more information:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
We observe the motions of the stars close to the center of our galaxy. Those stars are orbiting a very massive object that is not seen. Its mass and size means it has to be a black hole.


That's awesome. Bless those people, man. 16 years of research...

Now they really think they've located a black hole.

If only there was a way to detect it & prove them right.

Fox News... Why am I not surprised an you claim not to use Fox News lol!

Regardless did you have a point with any of this or were you just as usual humiliating yourself with your reject opinions?

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Just don't ask Dick if he's wrong, he'll chew you out for being Christian (and avoid the question). It's funny to hear the audience applaud ole Dick and not even notice his arrogance...

http://youtu.be/6mmskXXetcg

----

This one's great. Bill Oreilly puts Dick Dawkins in his place.

http://youtu.be/2FARDDcdFaQ

[QUOTE] We see religion losing on a hundred fronts and it's only getting worse. Plus saying you're a believer but not belonging to a church to help organize is a victory for us. "

Lol, "victory"??

Y'all really think this is a war, huh?

[QUOTE] Why even the GOP is poking you religious retards in the eyes in hopes of winning an election or two. Why? They realize appealing to religious retards is a losing proposition because your numbers are rapidly dwindling. Your ways are dying. It's for this reason alone your ilk wastes so much time, effort and money attacking us.
And you know it.
<quoted text>"

Obama swears to uphold the Constitution, "so help me God".....

http://youtu.be/f4RzFiF3z78

You're welcome.

LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
If it can't be seen, how do you know it exists?

Love cannot be seen, but we know it exists.

Fear cannot be seen, but we know it exists.

Black holes cannot be seen, but we know they exist.

God cannot be seen, but we know He exists.

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
If it cannot be seen, how do you know it exists? And since a black hole can have any mass and size, how are you supposed to be sure?


You know that Romulan ships uses a forced quantum singularity as a power source?

Super cool.

Until aliens try to use it as a nest...

Do you beat your children?

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>*computer* software....

Are you really that dumb??

Were you beaten as a child?

Givemeliberty wrote:
Fox News... Why am I not surprised an you claim not to use Fox News lol!
Regardless did you have a point with any of this or were you just as usual humiliating yourself with your reject opinions?
<quoted text>


Yes, the point is that Dick Dawkins is an arrogant prick that spreads his assumptions so that dumb asses like you can help him make his fortune.

And I never said I don't use Fox News, I said I've only posted them once or twice.

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Love cannot be seen, but we know it exists.
Fear cannot be seen, but we know it exists.
Black holes cannot be seen, but we know they exist.
God cannot be seen, but we know He exists.


But you feel them. Which is proof it exists. And feelings, like love, can be described.

Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't tell me you run linux.


Okay.

Givemeliberty wrote:

Do you beat your children?
<quoted text>


He used to. He doesn't regret it. He spanked his boy at 6 months old who couldn't talk.

He even spanked his son at 2, and he said to rr, "I hate you, i hate you", when he spanked him.
Posts 154801 to 154820 of 224164

Add your Comments

You'll need JavaScript enabled to post comments

By clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read our Terms of Service. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.

Offbeat Quiz: Which Wizard of Oz Character Are You?